Understanding the FAR: A Beginner’s Guide to Government Contracting (Part 15)

View Previous FAR Breakdowns

Now that we’ve explored the structured world of sealed bidding, let’s shift gears and dive into a more flexible, yet equally critical, procurement method: Contracting by Negotiation. Part 15 of the FAR covers how the government conducts negotiations for complex acquisitions, where factors beyond price, such as technical capability or past performance, play a crucial role. Unlike sealed bidding, negotiation allows for a deeper evaluation of proposals and more interaction between the government and prospective contractors.

Part 15: Contracting by Negotiation

Part 15 of the FAR outlines the procedures for contracting by negotiation, which is used when sealed bidding isn’t suitable. In this method, contracting officers can discuss proposals with offerors and consider multiple evaluation factors. This approach is typically used for more complex procurements where price alone isn’t the only determining factor, and the government requires greater flexibility in selecting a contractor.

Subpart 15.1 – Source Selection Processes and Techniques

Purpose: Contracting by negotiation allows agencies to consider factors beyond price, such as technical capability, management experience, and past performance, to ensure that the selected contractor is the best fit for the government’s needs.

Two Primary Techniques:

• Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA): In this technique, the government evaluates proposals based on the lowest price, provided the proposal meets all technical requirements.
• Tradeoff Process: Here, the government evaluates both price and non-price factors (e.g., technical merit, experience) and may select a higher-priced offer if it provides greater overall value.

Subpart 15.2 – Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information

Request for Proposals (RFP): The government issues a Request for Proposals (RFP) when contracting by negotiation. The RFP outlines the scope of the project, evaluation factors, proposal submission guidelines, and the terms and conditions of the contract.

Proposal Submission: Contractors respond to the RFP by submitting detailed proposals that address the technical, management, and cost aspects of the project. These proposals often require significantly more information than bids submitted under sealed bidding, including technical approaches, key personnel qualifications, and risk management strategies.

Late Submissions: Proposals received after the deadline are generally not considered, except under certain circumstances such as government delays or technical issues that affect submission.

Subpart 15.3 – Source Selection

Evaluation Factors: Contracting officers use evaluation factors outlined in the RFP to assess each proposal. These typically include price, technical capability, past performance, and risk. The weight given to each factor is specified in the RFP.

Competitive Range: After evaluating the initial proposals, the government establishes a “competitive range” that includes the most highly rated proposals. Only contractors in this range are eligible for further negotiations.

Clarifications and Discussions: In some cases, contracting officers may ask offerors for clarifications to ensure understanding of their proposals. Formal discussions or negotiations may also take place with contractors in the competitive range to address weaknesses, uncertainties, or deficiencies in their proposals.

Subpart 15.4 – Contract Pricing

Cost and Pricing Data: For negotiated contracts, the government may require contractors to submit cost and pricing data to ensure the price is fair and reasonable. This is especially important when there’s no competition or when the contract involves complex cost-reimbursement elements.

Cost Analysis: The government conducts a cost analysis to evaluate the reasonableness of each cost element, such as labor, materials, overhead, and profit.

Profit Considerations: The contracting officer ensures that the contractor’s proposed profit is reasonable, considering the risk, complexity, and duration of the project.

Subpart 15.5 – Preaward, Award, and Postaward Notifications, Protests, and Mistakes

Preaward Notices: Before making the award, the government notifies all offerors in the competitive range. This allows them to address any concerns or submit final revisions to their proposals.

Debriefings: After the award is made, the government provides debriefings to offerors who were not selected. These debriefings are critical for understanding why a proposal wasn’t successful and how future proposals can be improved.

Protests: Contractors can file protests if they believe the source selection process was unfair or if errors were made in evaluating their proposals. Protests are usually filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) or the Court of Federal Claims.

Subpart 15.6 – Unsolicited Proposals

What are Unsolicited Proposals? Unsolicited proposals are offers submitted by contractors to the government that weren’t requested through an RFP or any formal solicitation. These proposals often introduce innovative ideas or new technologies that the contractor believes could be beneficial to the government.

Evaluation of Unsolicited Proposals: The government reviews unsolicited proposals to determine if they meet agency needs and align with strategic objectives. Proposals must be unique, innovative, and offer a solution that’s not already available in the commercial marketplace.

Key Principles for Contracting by Negotiation

Here are some essential principles and best practices to ensure success when navigating Part 15 of the FAR:

1. Prepare a Detailed Proposal: Unlike sealed bidding, negotiating contracts require a well-rounded proposal that addresses technical, management, and pricing factors. Make sure your proposal provides thorough explanations, especially in areas like past performance and technical capabilities.
2. Focus on Evaluation Factors: Pay close attention to the evaluation factors outlined in the RFP. If technical merit is weighted heavily, ensure your proposal demonstrates clear technical superiority, even if price isn’t the lowest.
3. Be Ready for Negotiation: Be prepared for discussions or clarifications. Ensure your team has a solid understanding of your proposal’s strengths and can address potential weaknesses identified by the government.
4. Be Proactive with Unsolicited Proposals: If you have a unique solution or technology that the government could benefit from, consider submitting an unsolicited proposal. However, ensure it aligns with government needs and provides a clear advantage over existing solutions.

Practical Application: Case Studies

Let’s explore some hypothetical scenarios to illustrate how these principles apply in real-world situations:

Scenario 1: Using the Tradeoff Process for Complex IT Services

Your agency needs a contractor to provide IT services for a government-wide modernization project. Here’s how you ensure compliance with Part 15:

• RFP Issuance: The RFP outlines that technical expertise, management approach, and past performance are more important than price.
• Tradeoff Evaluation: You evaluate proposals using the tradeoff process, selecting the contractor with superior technical capability and experience, even though their proposal wasn’t the lowest in price.

Scenario 2: Clarifications and Discussions During Source Selection

Your agency is procuring equipment for military use, and multiple proposals have been submitted. Here’s how you comply with Part 15:

• Competitive Range: After evaluating the initial proposals, you establish a competitive range, selecting the most qualified bidders for further discussions.
• Clarifications: You engage in discussions with the offerors, asking them to clarify certain aspects of their technical proposals and to submit revised proposals based on feedback.

Scenario 3: Unsolicited Proposal for New Security Technology

A contractor submits an unsolicited proposal for a new security technology that could benefit multiple government agencies. Here’s how you comply with Part 15:

• Review Process: You evaluate the unsolicited proposal to determine if the technology is unique and offers a new capability not already available in the marketplace.
• Agency Needs: After reviewing the proposal, you determine it aligns with your agency’s strategic goals and initiate a formal review process to explore potential acquisition.

Best Practices for Contracting by Negotiation

Here are some practical tips to help your business stay compliant with Part 15 of the FAR:

1. Understand the Evaluation Process: Make sure your proposal aligns with the RFP’s evaluation criteria, paying close attention to non-price factors like technical capability, past performance, and risk.
2. Prepare for Negotiations: Be ready to engage in discussions and provide additional clarifications or revisions. Ensure your team is prepared to highlight the strengths of your proposal and address any identified weaknesses.
3. Leverage Past Performance: Emphasize past performance in areas similar to the current project. Demonstrating your track record for delivering quality results can set you apart from competitors.
4. Submit Unsolicited Proposals Thoughtfully: When submitting unsolicited proposals, ensure they provide an innovative solution that aligns with government needs. Present a clear value proposition and demonstrate why your idea is beneficial.

Conclusion

Part 15 of the FAR covers the complex process of contracting by negotiation, a method that allows the government to consider multiple factors beyond price when selecting contractors. This flexibility is crucial for more complex acquisitions, where technical expertise, past performance, and risk management play a significant role. By understanding and adhering to these requirements, your business can enhance its proposals, engage in meaningful negotiations, and increase its chances of securing government contracts.

In our next installment, we’ll explore Part 16 of the FAR, which covers Types of Contracts. Stay tuned as we continue to break down the FAR into manageable, understandable sections to help you succeed in government contracting.

About Us:

FedBiz Access is the leading government contracting business development and marketing firm that offers research and engagement strategy coaching, registrations, certifications, and GSA Schedules, as well as marketing packages to target government buyers. We have over 23 years of experience working with thousands of small and medium sized businesses worldwide, helping them win over $35.7 billion in awards. From registration to award, FedBiz helps you succeed in the government marketplace. 🦅

---

Important Note: This information is accurate as of 10/1/2024. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is updated regularly.